Test Results from the TVA Widows Creek Hazardous Waste Spill

Fair Use Rights not for profit usage - photo by Hurricane Creek Keeper John Waltham - South Wings Aviation.

photo by G. Morgan

Update: Jan 16, 2009, Report in today's Scottsboro newspaper, The Daily Sentinel http://thedailysentinel.com/story.lasso?ewcd=a1965ed1095d412c , has a quote by Mr. Roy Light, Manager of the Scottsboro Water Sewer and Gas Board, "...All of the tests are still within water limits. We just aren't seeing any impact from the spill." Hmm, have you looked Mr. Light? Are you also going to state that the grey sludge pictured, the fly ash and cenospheres pictured are not an impact from the spill. "No impact, from the spill," does that make TVA negligence ok? Still within water limits? I take it you mean permissible EPA limits of toxic contaminants, or do you? Yes the spill was and is in the limits of the water.

The article goes on to say the TVA is returning the solid materials to holding ponds on the site. That makes me feel much better, how about those materials suspended in solution, such as the Arsenic and Thallum, is TVA going to perform a feat of miraculous proportion and return those to the pond? Also, the report in the article says, "elevated levels of metals have been found on site," "these elevated levels pose no threat to the public or employees." The statement, "elevated levels of metals pose no threat to the public or employees," is not the truth, it is typical of the Culture of Deceit on the part of the TVA's management and propaganda wing.

>

The following test results of the hazardous waste spill into the Tennessee River at Widows Creek indicates elevated levels of the following hazardous materials ( The TVA describes testing samples upstream were taken 1000yards upstream from the steam plant, downstream samples were taken downstream along the shoreline 1000yards from the spill): Arsenic-upstream .0005mg/l, downstream .0010mg/l; Mercury-upstream .oo18mg/l, downstream .0019mg/l; Thallium- upstream .0008mg/l, downstream .001mg/l; Magnesium-upstream 4.02mg/l, downstream 4.96mg/l; Manganese- upstream .019mg/l, downstream .119mg/l; Zinc-upstream .012mg/l, downstream .017mg/l; Titanium- upstream .026mg/l, downstream .035mg/l; Cobalt- upstream .0005mg/l, downstream .001mg/l; Chromium- upstream .002mg/l, downstream .0023mg/l.

>

Arsenic, Mercury, Thallium, Magnesium, Manganese, Zinc, Boron, Titanium, Cobalt and Chromium were all found in higher levels downstream than upstream as a result of the hazardous materials release. An elevated level of aluminum was also reported as a result of the spill in downstream sampling. Aluminum levels upstream 1.21mg/l, downstream 1.71mg/l.

>>

Another question apparently not answered is the ph level of the river water. Has there been a noticeable change in the ph of the water downstream from the spill?

>>>

Interpretation of test results http://www.ces.purdue.edu/extmedia/WQ/WQ-5.html A permissible level of a hazardous material may not be a safe level.