JAMES MADISON QUOTE - 1822

"A popular government without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power knowledge gives."

SCOTTSBORO WEATHER - SUN & MOON RISE

Monday, December 16, 2019

Scottsboro, Alabama - December, 16, 2019 - Scottsboro City Council Work Session and Regular Session - Wishing All a Merry Christmas and A Happy New Year - Last Meeting of the Year

Scottsboro City Hall, photo by G. Morgan

Before the agenda and video, a bit of Christmas Music by the Folks at Post Modern Jukebox
MERRY CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR



                                                  AGENDA

VIDEO

Scottsboro, Alabama - December 16, 2019 - Jackson County Commission Dual Session - Last Meeting of the Year, Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to All!

First Monday around the Courthouse Square, 1955 Ford Times - Fair Use for non-profit news reporting.

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to All, this will be the last commission report for the year.

Before the Report, some Christmas Music by the Post Modern Jukebox folks.



                                                       AGENDA


VIDEO



        MATHENY'S BRIDGE - A STORY OF COUNTY AND STATE COOPERATION
                                 (Click on image for an expanded view.)

Wednesday, December 11, 2019

Paint Rock, Alabama - December 11, 2019 - Back in the News - Building Code Ordinance - Safety versus Unlawful Inspections and Entry of Homes and Buildings - More on the Dilemmas of a Small Town, Doing What is Right

Old Railroad Sign, Paint Rock, Alabama photo by G. Morgan


Paint Rock, Alabama - a small town in west Jackson County Alabama located on U.S. Highway 72. Population in 2017 estimated at 204 residing in the town limits. Photo from Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paint_Rock,_Alabama  Fair Use for non-profit news reporting and commentary.

The views and opinions expressed within this article are my thoughts on this issue and does not reflect a bonafide legal opinion as I'm not an attorney. Links and articles listed are easily available on the World Wide Web and are based on good sense and well established, easily read law available to any person.

Paint Rock citizens are upset and concerned regarding this ordinance.
One concerned citizen commented that she was afraid of the Mayor or town council breaking into her home to perform a so called inspection. Others stated they would defend their property as necessary from an illegal search by city officials. 

Previously in June 2018, Paint Rock citizens expressed concerns regarding closed meetings, not open to the public and Open Meetings requirements. Link to articles about that issue on this blog - https://arklite.blogspot.com/search/label/Paint%20Rock%20Alabama  , the open meeting problems were resolved by the town council and mayor after several heated discussions and a presentation by the Town Attorney. In the current ordinace, the "Town Attorney" is described as the "Department of Law."

This time the concern involves the town's "Building Code Ordinance" and the alleged right of the "building official" or his or her appointed representative to enter homes, businesses or premises to "inspect" premises at "reasonable times. The new ordinance provided to this writer by concerned citizens, regarding building codes, is not signed or dated, but has been distributed as occurred with the open meetings ordinance. It appears there was no legal review of this ordinance before distribution. Hopefully, this small town which has very few funds if any, will quickly learn their lessons before there is a costly legal action. 

Image of the "Building Code" opening.
(Click on image for an expanded view.)
The entire code consists of 15 pages, some of the code appears to be out of date and is revised from the original International Code Committee code set.

The concerning part involves entry to premises for inspection. Reasons for the "Right of Entry" (page 6) are not stipulated in this portion of the code. Definitions are stated on page 9. It seems on reading this part of the code that the building inspector or his representative may enter any premises to inspect without just cause.

Research on this issue.
Cullman, Alabama has an extensive code on the issue of inspection and entry. Link: https://librarystage.municode.com/al/cullman/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH10BUBURE_ARTVIADEN_S10-367IN
(a)
Inspections required under the provisions of this chapter shall be made by the building department. Upon evidence of probable cause and presentation of proper credentials, authorized agents of the building department may enter, at reasonable times, any building, structure, or premises in the city in order to enforce this article.
(b)
Any property, building, equipment, appliance, or system installed, constructed, erected, altered, repaired, maintained, or used in the city shall be subject to inspection by the building department.
(c)
No official or employee of the building department making inspection of properties for the purpose of determining the necessity for repairs or corrections shall have any financial interest, directly or indirectly, in any repairs or corrections which may be required by this article. 
  • (a)
    The building department, in addition to other procedures provided, may obtain an inspection warrant under the conditions specified in this chapter. The warrant shall authorize the director or agents thereof to conduct a search or inspection of property, either with or without the consent of the person whose property is to be searched or inspected, under the conditions set out in this article.
    (b)
    Inspection warrants may be issued by the municipal court when the issuing judge is satisfied that all of the following conditions are met:
    (1)
    The person seeking the warrant must establish under oath or affirmation that the property to be inspected is to be inspected as a part of a legally authorized program of inspection which includes that property or that there is probable cause for believing that there is a condition, object, activity, or circumstance which legally justifies such an inspection of that property.
    (2)
    The issuing judge determines that the warrant is authorized by this article.
    (c)
    The inspection warrant shall be issued only if it meets all of the following requirements:
    (1)
    The warrant is attached to the affidavit required to be made in order to obtain the warrant.
    (2)
    The warrant describes, either directly or by reference to the affidavit, the property upon which the inspection is to occur and is sufficiently accurate that the executor of the warrant and the owner or possessor of the property can reasonably determine from it the property for which the warrant authorizes an inspection.
    (3)
    The warrant indicates the conditions, objects, activities, or circumstances which the inspection is intended to check or reveal.
    (4)
    The warrant refers, in general terms, to the Code provisions sought to be enforced.

    Case law and Discussion 
    The Pennsylvania Law Weekly, May 18, 2017, By: Zachary A. Sivertsen, Esq.
    Municipalities throughout the [states] have enacted property maintenance, zoning and building codes to ensure construction is performed safely and in a technically sound manner, development occurs in an orderly fashion and properties are maintained and kept free of safety hazards. Key components of these regulatory schemes are inspections performed by municipal agents and employees, such as code enforcement officers and building inspectors, who monitor conformity with municipal regulations and issue citations and violation notices for noncompliance. Such “administrative inspections” however, may, in certain circumstances, violate the constitutional rights of residents to be free from unwarranted searches, guaranteed by both the U.S. and [state] constitutions. In fact, any search of private property by the government or someone acting on behalf of the government implicates the Fourth Amendment’s protections.

    Most people are aware of these limitations, at least peripherally, in the context of police officers and other law enforcement officials investigating suspected criminal activity—namely the requirement that a search warrant be obtained prior to performing a nonconsensual search of property. Failure to obtain court permission for such a search invokes the “fruit of poisonous tree” doctrine, by which any evidence discovered as a result of the search is inadmissible against the occupant or property owner. This type of search warrant is known as a “general search warrant,” and must be issued by a judge.

    Less well known though, is that inspections to enforce municipal regulations (including zoning ordinances, property maintenance code requirements, construction code requirements, rental or other licensing requirements, and other property-related municipal ordinances) are subject to the same constitutional restrictions. Thus when a municipal officer or agent wishes to perform an inspection, but does not have the owner or occupant’s permission to do so, they must obtain an “administrative search warrant.” Administrative search warrants are almost always issued by magisterial district judges; though case law indicates that such warrants could be issued by a neutral magistrate or officer, as in Commonwealth v. Tobin, 828 A.2d 415, 419 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2003).
    To obtain either type of search warrant, the requesting official must demonstrate “probable cause.” This means that the requesting official must have a reasonable basis to believe a crime has been committed (for general warrants) or that an inspection should be conducted (for administrative warrants). The standard for establishing probable cause for an administrative warrant is different and less stringent than that required for a general warrant. To obtain an administrative warrant, probable cause can be established by showing that “reasonable legislative or administrative standards for conducting an area inspection are satisfied with respect to a particular dwelling,” as in Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523, 538 (1967).
    Relevant factors for evaluating probable cause include: the passage of time since a prior inspection, the condition of the premises, and the condition of the general area. Another basis is if there is a general administrative plan for the enforcement of an ordinance that is “derived from neutral sources,” as in Marshall v. Barlow’s, 436 U.S. 307, 321 (1978). For example, a property maintenance code with a general inspection schedule that clearly identifies districts of the municipality to be inspected, timelines for performing inspections of those areas, and a checklist of minimum standards to guide the inspections.
    The underlying standard applied by the court when evaluating all searches, is reasonableness. The fundamental purpose of the constitutional protection from unwarranted searches is to protect individual privacy rights from government intrusion. Reasonableness is assessed by balancing the need of the municipal official or agent to perform the search, against the level of invasion into the property owner or occupant’s privacy rights that will result from the search.
  • This is not to say that an administrative warrant must be obtained in every situation. Certain exceptions from the warrant requirement do exist. The primary exception implicated in the context of administrative inspections is the existence of “exigent circumstances.” This is when there is some compelling need for official action, such as a fire or other emergency that creates an immediate threat to public health or safety, and there is no time to secure a warrant.
United States of America Constitution, 4th Amendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Alabama Constitution: "Section 5 - Unreasonable Search and Seizure; Search Warrants - That the people shall be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and possessions from unreasonable seizure or searches, and that no warrants shall issue to search any place or to seize any person or thing without probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation."

The town of Paint Rock, Alabama should insure that any ordinance prior to implementation or distribution to citizens should receive a legal review to insure shortcomings and errors do not result in future legal action. For the town's officials to not acquire a legal review is, in my opinion, negligent. Note the Cullman, Alabama Ordinance and procedures above.






Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Scottsboro, Alabama - December 9, 2019 - Scottsboro City Council Regular Session - 10% Remaining Budget Approved for $2,219,292

Scottsboro City Hall, photo by G. Morgan

Agenda Item 4 - Ten percent of remaining FY 2020 Budget Approved for $2,219,292.00


AGENDA
(Click to expand image.)


VIDEO

Scottsboro, Alabama - December 9, 2019 - Jackson County Commission Regular Session - One Time Pay Increase and HVAC System Replacement Approved

Jackson County Courthouse, North Side photo by G. Morgan

Two major expenditures approved in the agenda. Item 3- $600.00 one time payment for all employees regardless of status, political officials, and contracted employees. Total of all expenditures this disbursement is $99,968.60  Item 9 - HVAC System upgrade $822,407.00

AGENDA
(Click on image to expand view.)

VIDEO

Tuesday, December 3, 2019

Scottsboro, Alabama - December 2, 2019 - Scottsboro City Council Work Session

Scottsoro City Hall, photo by G. Morgan

Approved Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 City of Scottsboro Budget
(Click on image to expand image.)


AGENDA
(Click on image to expand.)
Council Member Bailey recommended a disbursement of $25,000 be provided to the Scottsboro Boys Museum.

VIDEO

Scottsboro, Alabama December 2, 2019 Jackson County Commission Work Session

Jackson County Courthouse, North Entrance

Interview of Jackson County Commission Chair Tim Guffey - TOPICS: Budget, People, Services, Courthouse, Problems - Solutions


AGENDA
(Click on image to expand view.)

WORK SESSION VIDEO

Wednesday, November 13, 2019

Taking a break until Dec 2, 2019

Yellow Swallow Tail Butterfly, photo by G. Morgan

Hi y'all, some of you may know I have medical issues which I must get resolved. I'll be taking a break from government meeting reporting until December 2, 2019 - Hope everyone has a great Thanksgiving!


Tuesday, November 5, 2019

Scottsboro, Alabama - November 4, 2019 - Scottsboro City Council Work and Regular Sessions

Scottsboro City Hall photo by G. Morgan

AGENDA


VIDEO
Work Session and Regular Session

Scottsboro, Alabama - November 4, 2019 Jackson County Commission Work Session - County Attorney Comments on False, Degrading Comments

Jackson County Courthouse, north Entrance, photo by G. Morgan.

County Attorney John Porter comments on false and degrading statements, his comments may be seen in the below video at 30 min. 30 sec. (photo by G. Morgan)

AGENDA

VIDEO
County Attorney John Porter's comments regarding demeaning and false statements may be found at 30 minutes 30 seconds.

Tuesday, October 29, 2019

Scottsboro, Alabama - October 28, 2019 - Scottsboro City Council Dual Session - Hutton Development Tax Incentive Approved - Chick-Fil-A Coming to Town?

Scottsboro City Hall, photo by G. Morgan

Item 8 on the Regular Session City Council Agenda, Tax Use Incentive for commercial development was approved for Hutton Development. The property involved is the old #1 China Restaurant, previous Shoney's Restaurant property between the Kentucky Fried Chicken and Dunham's Sporting Goods on John T. Reid Parkway, U.S. Highway 72. The vote for approval was 4 to 1, Greg Mashburn being the single dissenting vote. Current fast food restaurant owners in Scottsboro had spoke against the project development at a previous city council meeting.

Hutton Development personnel in attendance would not confirm the property will be utilized for a Chick-Fil-A Restaurant; however Hutton representatives did confirm real estate contracts for the 2 acres for the restaurant property and an additional 8 acres are in the process of being sold. The property is currently owned by Garcia Properties. The sale was contingent on the road safety renovation, including a traffic light and extension of the service road, regarding Hwy 72 and County Park Rd. being approved along with the city tax incentive. 

There has been considerable rumor and discussion that the property would be utilized as a Chik-Fil-A restaurant, although not confirmed by the developer at this time, Hutton Development representatives did confirm they had recently finished a similar project with tax incentive's in Sylacauga, Alabama. That specific project was a Chick-Fil-A, more info on the Sylacauga Chick-Fil-A : https://www.sylacauganews.com/local/developer-confirms-chick-fil-plans-sylacaugas-new-marble-city-square  Hutton Development of Chattanooga, Tennessee has developed several Chick-Fil-A projects.

90% of 2019 - 2020 Budget approved for $19,891,869.00

AGENDAS
(Click on image for an expanded view.)
See work session agenda, items 1-7 are items 2-8 on regular council agenda. Item 1 on the regular agenda, Library Board Appointments, was postponed until a November council meeting due to a board member resignation.  Interested citizens have until November 4 prior to 4:30PM, to submitt applications for the 3 Library Board vacancies.

VIDEOS
Work Session



                                        Regular Session

Monday, October 21, 2019

Thursday, October 10, 2019

Scottsboro, Alabama October 7, 2019 - Jackson County Commission Agenda and Video Segment - Scottsboro City Council Agenda

Jackson County Courthouse, North Side, photo by G. Morgan

The video covers agenda items 1) Birthday of Employees; and 2) County Road 17 report and status, in part. I left the commission meeting early so that I could cover the Community/Town Hall Meeting between the Jackson County Commission and the Jackson County Legislative Delegation at 6 PM. Link: https://arklite.blogspot.com/2019/10/scottsboro-alabama-october-7-2019-2.html

Next commission meeting will be Monday, October 28, 2019.


AGENDA
(Click on image for an expanded view.)

Video for Agenda Items 1 and 2, in part




SCOTTSBORO CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 7, 2019
Scottsboro City Hall, photo by G. Morgan

No City Council Video, attended Community/Town Hall Meeting, link above.

AGENDA
(Click on image for an expanded view.)

NOTICE OF SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING
OF 
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE 
CITY OF SCOTTSBORO, ALABAM
"...Wednesday, October 16, 2019, at 5:00 P.M. at the City Hall located at 316 Broad Street,
Scottsboro, Alabama 35768, for the purpose of considering, among other things,  the adoption of an ordinance authorizing the issuance and sale of the City's General Obligation Warrants, Series 2019-B..."
Dated this 8th day of October, 2019.

 
/s/ Patrick Stewart
President of the City Council
CITY OF SCOTTSBORO, ALABAMA

OCTOBER 2019 SCOTTSBORO CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE

There will not be a Council Meeting on Monday, October 14th.

There is a Special Called Council Meeting on Wednesday, October 16th at 5:00 pm to consider bond refunding & documents.

The next regular Council Meeting is scheduled for October 21 at 6 pm.

There will be a Work Session and Council Meeting on October 28 at 6 pm